Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Syria: Terror Inc, Home to the largest CIA2 station in the world....

Syria: Terror Inc, Home to the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia.

The list of countries affected by Syrian terror sponsorship had (most recently) included states like Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the US, Germany (and US targets there), Spain, Israel and more. Now add Bahrain to the list (Arabic articles here and here).

The Bahraini (Shiites) who were arrested for plotting to carry out major terror attacks during Bahrain's national holiday on December 17, trained for their operation in Syria, adding further support to the charge that Syria is Terror Grand Central -- consciously using its territory as a safe haven, revolving door, and distribution/reorientation hub for terrorists of all stripes targeting Syria's enemies (which happen to be the list supplied by the US and its allies, to Syria: Terror Inc, Home to the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia.... ).

What's interesting about this latest episode is that it involves Shiite terrorists, highlighting how Syria works with terrorists of all stripes, while also further bringing into light the multiple functions of the Syria: Terror Inc, Home to the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades .

Furthermore, it sheds light on a pillar of the Syrians' 30 year-old strategic alliance with the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades (which some geniuseszzz today believe they can break through "engagement" over the Golan). The Syrian nexus with the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades terrorism is chronic, dating back to the earliest days of the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades , even prior to the Khomeinist takeover in Iran, all the way to the current intricate and intimate relationship with Hezbollah, whose Imad Mughniyeh was killed in Damascus by Asef Shawkat, serving his masters at CIA2/MOSSAD, where he was staying in a building owned by a business associate of Assad's cousin, Rami Makhlouf (meaning, he was personally patronized by Assad's inner-most circles). *



The nexus also involved Mughniyeh and Hezbollah's training of Muqtada Sadr's Mahdi Army, whose fighters traveled to and via Syria to be trained by Hezbollah.....

One of the essential aspects of the Syria-CIA2/MOSSAD alliance (which is the farthest thing possible from that ignorant cliché, "marriage of convenience" label), is how it allows Syria, a weak and resourceless Third World country, to blackmail, threaten and intimidate the far richer Gulf states, as well as to target Western enemies as well, thereby allowing Syria to punch well above its weight.....through the cover of the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades .

As such, and by way of example, Syria/MOSSAD2 then, had a direct role in the attacks against the US and France in Beirut in 1983..... although we had forewarned Robert McFarlane of the truck bomb.... he chose to ignore the warning.....

Furthermore, Mughniyeh, Hezbollah and Iran, all were directly involved in sabotage in Gulf states with substantial Shiite populations, and were behind groups like the Saudi Hezbollah and the Kuwaiti Hezbollah.

The Kuwaitis provide a recent example of how Syria benefits from CIA2's muscle to blackmail and extort weak Gulf states like Kuwait. Earlier this year, around the time of the Arab summit, which was to be held in Syria for the first time, and was being boycotted by most Arab heads of state, the Kuwaiti embassy was threatened by Hezbollah, and other Mughniyeh-related problems surfaced in Kuwait, and lo and behold, Kuwait was one of the handful of Arab states who sent a high-ranking delegation to Syria.

And so, terror sponsorship and the alliance with Iran are not reactive Syrian policies remedied by the return of the Golan Heights. They are proactive policies by a regime whose only way to project influence well above its capacities is through violence, terrorism, intimidation and blackmail, as I emphasized in my most recent article.

This always was the case, as noted by Jubin Goodarzi, and the relationship with CIA2 afforded Assad possibilities on a number of regional fronts that would enable him to play out his regime's overinflated role conception, self-image and self-importance, and even possibly financing Assad's efforts to acquire a North Korean nuclear reactor (not to mention Russian advanced weaponry. See also the Syrian-Venezuelan-Iranian nexus in that regard). Michael Rubin recently discussed a variant angle of this function of the alliance, with regards to the chronic Syrian claims to Arab primacy....via its chronic liaison to the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades ....

Far from wanting to "flip" to the American side, Syria did enlist the USA and the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades, in its campaign to undermine US Arab allies -- as Lee Smith put it, to have Washington play "the bagman in an extortion racket" against US's chosen targets within "Arab puppets" -- while maintaining the alliance with CIA, as it did throughout the 60s,90s.....and today, through the infamous White House Murder Inc, stationed in Damascus and headed by Asef Shawkat.

The notion that Syria will abandon this long-held and overall successful symbiosis for the sake of a tiny piece of land betrays utter ignorance of the regime's nature and interests. Ephraim Inbar said it well today:

The naïve belief that territorial concessions will dissuade Syria from continuing its cozy relationship with the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades, is baseless. Precisely those who belittle the strategic importance of the Golan Heights believe that Syria ascribes great importance to this piece of territory and its transfer to Syrian hands could change the foreign policy orientation of Damascus. Henry Kissinger, former US secretary of state, tried successfully to move Syria toward a pro-American orientation in 1976. Under more auspicious international circumstances, after the Cold War, the formidable US secretary of state James Baker tried again and succeeded to keep the strongest possible liaison with the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades, to the detriment of the subtle diplomacy of the inert state department..... Even when Washington was the only game in town, the Syrians preferred ties with the American's White House Murder Inc,. and the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades .

Similarly far-fetched is the expectation that Damascus would stop arms and cash flow to Hezbollah and would expel the Islamic Jihad and Hamas headquarters from Syria......
The expectations that the Syrian regime will behave differently than in the past betrays an ignorance of Middle Eastern politics, and espouses unfounded optimism.

Terrorism is literally the Assad family business, and has been so since they came to power. The notion that the same policies that failed miserably in the 90s will result in the opposite outcome for reasons unbeknownst to all, is the best definition not just of delusion, but also of insanity. It's what Lee Smith dubbed "the Damascus Disease":

In the 90s, when the Bush 41 and Clinton administrations thought it was buying off the conmen in Damascus, instead it wound up with a strengthened Hezbollah, the consolidation of the Syria-CIA2/MOSSAD alliance, and the second intifada.

You'd think US policy speculators would've learned by now. But then again, many of them continue to confuse diplomacy with inducements of the largest CIA2 station in the world.... and its subsidiary headed by Asef Shawkat, the odious White House Murder Inc, Headquartered covertly in Damascus, with direct control, coordination and command by CIA2/MOSSAD, via the terror chief Assef Shawqat and the Assad's Mafia..... proliferating in Syria for decades, and which is totally hidden from oversight of both houses in DC .....and various very large slush-funds .....


Saturday, December 27, 2008

CIA warns of nuclear war in subcontinent between India and Pakistan.

CIA warns of nuclear war in subcontinent

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has warned the Bush administration of a possible nuclear war between India and Pakistan.

The turmoil in Afghanistan and Pakistan could spill over into Jammu & Kashmir, prompting Indian leaders to take aggressive and retaliatory action, according to the CIA.

In assessing the security situation in the region, a CIA report observed: "Continued turmoil in Afghanistan and Pakistan will spill over into Kashmir and other areas of the subcontinent, prompting Indian leaders to take more aggressive preemptive and retaliatory actions...

"India's conventional military advantage over Pakistan will widen as a result of New Delhi's superior economic position… Changing military capabilities will be prominent among the factors that determine the risk of war."

The report, titled Global Trends 2015, which is now available with Pakistan's interior affairs ministry, further observed: "India most likely will expand the size of its nuclear-capable force. Islamabad has publicly claimed that the number of nuclear weapons/missiles it deploys will be independent of the size of India's arsenal. But a noticeable increase in the size of the Indian arsenal will prompt Pakistan to further increase the size of its arsenal."

On Pakistan's economic woes, the CIA said: "Pakistan will not recover easily from
the devastating PNAC CIA2/MOSSAD/MI6 odious assassination of Benazir Bhutto and decades of political and economic mismanagement...and the subsequent forced resignation of Perwez Musharraf by CIA and the infamous White House Murder Inc, Nascent democratic reforms will produce little change in the face of opposition from an entrenched political elite and Islamic parties...."

Someone on this site recently referred to the BBC documentary shown below. It took a while, but I finally found the links for viewing it. I watched it last night, and (for me) it was well worth the time.

The Power of Nightmares

(**)The Power of Nightmares, subtitled The Rise of the Politics of Fear, is a BBC documentary film series, written and produced by Adam Curtis. Its three one-hour parts consist mostly of a montage of archive footage with Curtis's narration. The series was first broadcast in the United Kingdom in late 2004 and has subsequently been broadcast in multiple countries and shown in several film festivals, including the 2005 Cannes Film Festival.

The films compare the rise of the Neo-Conservative movement in the United States and the radical Islamist movement, making comparisons on their origins and claiming similarities between the two. More controversially, it argues that the threat of radical Islamism as a massive, sinister organized force of destruction, specifically in the form of al-Qaeda, is a myth perpetrated by politicians in many countries (and particularly American Neo-Conservatives) in an attempt to unite and inspire their people following the failure of earlier, more Utopian ideologies.......
IN THREE PARTS (1 hr. each)

1) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2798679275960015727

2) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=46021716653280418763)


I have been referring to THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES for years now, on many sites, including this one, many times.

It really explains a great deal, Terrorizing the People into Losing Their Rights by way of USA-PATRIOT Act, and other means by the Powers that Want to Rule the World.
Israel is waiting for the weather to clear, so they can launch an assault on Gaza, and a possible re-occupation. Whenever the Zionists engage in mass-slaughter, they like to have something happening elsewhere to divert the worlds attention. India vs Pakistan would be a diversion, possibly a nuclear one, which would suit the Zionists state just fine. Could that be what the Mumbai attack was a prelude to?

India awaits "green light":

Part 3: Making It on Its Own


Constrained by its geography since its inception in 1947, Pakistan has found it virtually impossible to develop a strong economy, so it has had to think outside the box. One effective strategy has been to leverage the political and security aspects of its geography, posed by the confluence of countries and cultures in the region. This mix of Iran, India, Afghanistan, Shiite Islam, Sunni Islam and Hinduism has meant that powers beyond Pakistan’s immediate frontiers have had a vested interest in its survival. But this could be changing as the world moves away from Pakistan and as it moves closer to its day of reckoning as a functioning nation-state.


Editor’s Note: This is the third part of a series on Pakistan.

Very few developing states boast strong economies. Even those that do, such as Brazil, suffer from a host of problems, including insufficient infrastructure and technical personnel, high levels of corruption, shallow local capital markets, currency risk and overdependence on commodities. Pakistan suffers from all of these ailments — and more, as we have discussed in earlier installments of this series.

As we look at the economic factors contributing to Pakistan’s problems, we will first evaluate the Pakistani economy on its merits (or lack thereof). Then we will explain how things are just about as good as they can possibly get.

Security, Debt and Deficit

Pakistan historically has been an economically weak, mismanaged and corrupt state. The Pakistani military elite, deeply entrenched in the economy, holds much of the country’s wealth as well as a number of key assets in the corporate and real estate sectors. The agricultural industry remains the country’s economic backbone, employing some 44 percent of the population, yet accounting for only 21 percent of Pakistan’s gross domestic product (GDP). The remainder of the GDP comes from services (53 percent) and industry (27 percent).

Pakistan’s most fundamental economic problem is that it has very few natural resources to tap in the first place. And it is not necessarily a matter of lacking the resources; security issues in the country’s northwest have long constrained even basic exploration in much of the country, going back to times that predate the British colonial experience. In order to industrialize, therefore, Pakistan has been forced to import whatever materials it needs without first being able to establish a source of income. The unavoidable results are high debt and a sustained, massive trade deficit. As of 2008, the country’s national debt was more than 60 percent of GDP, and the trade deficit about 9.3 percent of GDP.

Even agriculture, the cash cow of many developed states, is a bit of a no-go for the Pakistanis. The Indus River Valley might be productive — indeed, Pakistan has leveraged it to become the 11th-largest producer of wheat — but the country remains a net importer of foodstuffs largely due to the a burgeoning population of 168 million. Though Pakistan is the fifth-largest exporter of rice and 14th-largest exporter of cotton, floods and pest pressure over the past year have hit rice and cotton production hard, with the growth rate last reported by the agricultural sector (for fiscal year 2008) at a dismal 1.5 percent.

The bulk of Pakistan’s exports come from low-value-added products such as textiles and chemicals, but the relative income from such sources has been declining for three decades and is somewhat in danger of disappearing altogether. Pakistan used to enjoy access to the broad Commonwealth market, but starting in 1973, when the United Kingdom joined the European Economic Community (EEC, a predecessor to the European Union), that market evaporated, forcing Pakistan to compete internationally on its own merits. And now that textiles are subject to the full/normal trading rules of the World Trade Organization, Pakistan lacks much of a competitive advantage. China, Bangladesh and India can regularly produce textiles at lower cost. In fact, the only true growth industry in Pakistan is its near-monopoly on fuel supply to NATO forces in Afghanistan. Aside from refining, nearly all of Pakistan’s economic sectors face massive challenges at best, and are flirting with collapse at worst.

The net result is not only a low level of development (with the notable exception of Karachi, the center for Pakistan’s international trade, and Lahore, the country’s agricultural capital), but also a chronic lack of capital to invest in the sorts of projects, such as infrastructure, education and finance, that could enable Pakistan to make true economic progress. Pakistan’s only substantial source of capital comes from abroad, and access to that capital is dependent upon factors such as currency rates, the global economic situation and the price of oil — factors that remain firmly beyond Islamabad’s influence.

And the need for new sources of capital is now greater than ever. In recent years, Pakistan has witnessed a collapse of its infrastructure, with power outages of up to six hours a day across the country. The 2008 spikes in energy and food prices almost bankrupted the state. In the year to date, Pakistan’s food bill has jumped by 46 percent over 2007 figures, and its oil bill by 56 percent. Simultaneously, the deteriorating security environment has manifested itself in major cities in the form of suicide bombings — Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi have not proved immune — and has done an excellent job of chasing away foreign and even domestic investors. Foreign direct investment (FDI) per capita in Pakistan has plunged to a barely noticeable US$32 per year. (By comparison, sub-Saharan Africa’s per capita FDI is US$50 per year.)

Pakistan is holding the line only by spending money that it does not have to spare. What social stability that remains can largely be credited to food and energy subsidies, which have contributed to an annual inflation rate of more than 25 percent. The costs of those subsidies, along with ongoing military deployments, have landed the budget in deficit to the tune of 7.4 percent of GDP, among the world’s highest. Recent spending has reduced Pakistan’s foreign currency reserves by 75 percent in the course of one year to US$3.45 billion. This is only enough to cover one month of imports, bringing the country dangerously close to defaulting on its debts. Though it has seen some respite in the form of sharply declining oil prices, Pakistan’s ability to finance the debt through bond issues has effectively ended; during a credit crisis, few investors want to lend to well-managed countries, much less a badly run country like Pakistan.

The Economic Limits of Geography

What truly sets Pakistan apart from other countries in terms of economic performance is a geography that greatly curtails its economic opportunities. Of Pakistan’s cities, only Karachi remains globally competitive by most measures. Karachi is the country’s only real port and has easy access to major trade lanes. Moving north along the Indus Valley, one becomes tightly hemmed in by marshes and deserts to the east and arid highlands to the west. The result is that Karachi functions as a city-state unto itself, with the bulk of Pakistan’s population found much farther upstream, where the Indus Valley widens.

The upper Indus is where the country’s best infrastructure is located and where any deep, integrated development might take place. But such development is impossible for three reasons. First, the region’s high population has required extensive irrigation, which has drawn down the Indus’ water level, making it unnavigable by any but the smallest of ships. The upper Indus region is, in effect, cut off from Karachi except by far more expensive rail or road transport. Second, the upper Indus’ natural market and trading partner is none other than India. Indian-Pakistani hostility denies the region the chance for progress. Finally, what water the Indus does have is not under Pakistan’s control; the headwaters of not just the Indus but nearly all of its major tributaries lie not in Pakistan, but in Indian-controlled territory. India is damming up those rivers, both to generate electricity and to further tilt the balance of power away from Pakistan.

The remainder of Pakistan’s population is split off (or perhaps more accurately, sequestered) into the mountainous region of the North-West Frontier Province and Federally Administered Tribal Areas, a region that is simply too remote to justify developing under normal circumstances. With the notable exception of Karachi, economic development in Pakistan is virtually impossible without the country somehow getting past its conflict with India.

Thus, the question must be asked: How is Pakistan able to survive? Economic development has been nearly impossible since partition from India, and certainly since the United Kingdom joined the EEC. The answer, put simply, is that Islamabad has been very creative. What Pakistan has succeeded in doing is leveraging the political and security aspects of its geography in order to keep its system going. Just as geography has been Pakistan’s curse, to a great degree it also has become its lifeline. Pakistan sits at the intersection of many regions, countries and cultures, including Iran, India, Afghanistan, Shiite Islam, Sunni Islam and Hinduism. This mix makes ruling Pakistan a major headache on the best of days, but it also means that powers beyond Pakistan’s immediate frontiers have a vested interest in seeing Pakistan not fail.

British diplomatic and economic support has maintained the Pakistani-Indian balance of power. All manner of Chinese support, including the sharing of nuclear technology, has strengthened Pakistan against a far superior India. Economic and energy support from Arabs of the Persian Gulf has lent strength to Pakistan when it seemed that India would overwhelm it. And support from the United States, which proved critical in backing the Pakistanis against the Soviet-leaning Indians during the Cold War, continues today in exchange for Pakistan’s support in the war against militant Islamism.

Islamabad’s success in leveraging its geography means that the country has not had to succeed economically on its merits for decades. Put another way, Pakistan has leveraged its geopolitical position not only to push for softer security policies from the United States or India, but also to pay the bills.

This has certainly been replicated in current times. None other than U.S. Central Command chief Gen. David Petraeus was reported to have personally intervened with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to ensure that Pakistan received a US$7.6 billion loan in November, a loan for which Pakistan certainly did not qualify. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates chipped in another US$2 billion in credit, while China contributed US$500 million and the Asian Development Bank provided another US$300 million — all in the past few weeks.

While these funds certainly will delay Pakistan’s day of reckoning, they are unlikely to prevent it. Pakistan’s economy is flirting with becoming nonfunctional, and it cannot operate in the black any more. Doing that would at a minimum require slashing military and subsidy expenditures, an impossible move for a socially seething country operating on a war footing (and, incidentally, a move the IMF loan supposedly will require).

But the real danger is that the world is shifting away from Pakistan, and with that shift, Pakistan’s ability to leverage its geography diminishes. The United States views Pakistan to be as much part of the problem of the Afghan insurgency as it is part of the solution. Oil prices have dropped by US$100 a barrel in less than five months, drastically limiting the Gulf Arabs’ ability to dole out cash. China has many concerns, and fighting Islamist extremism that has leaked into its own western provinces is something Beijing is now weighing against its commitment to Pakistan. The result might not prove to be a total cutoff of funds, but a slackening of support certainly seems to be in the offing. And without such outside support, Pakistan will have to make it or break it on its own — something it has never proved capable of doing.

Whenever an institute in USA has a "peace" or Inter-religious, or religious, or "friendship; or USAID, it's about covert ops.

[ Whenever an institute in USA has a "peace" or Inter-religious, or
religious, or "friendship; or USAID, etc. component in it, you can
be 100% sure that the real aims behind it all is Intelligence gathering or
covert operations or Both...]

They came in Peace..... Christmas in Beirut 1983....? Do you remember?


PNAC's covert and overt involvements with CIA/MOSSAD,
US Committee for a Free Lebanon:

Ziad Abdelnour, a Lebanese American devoted to the cause of driving Syria
from Lebanon, has been involved in a number of neocon-led initiatives on
Middle East politics. He is the founder of the U.S. Committee for a Free
Lebanon (USCFL), an advocacy group supported by Michael Ledeen, Jeane
Kirkpatrick, James Woolsey, Elliot Abrams, Douglas Feith, and Frank Gaffney.
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/abdelnour/abdelnour ....

The United States Committee for a Free Lebanon ("USCFL") is a non-profit,
non-sectarian think tank, founded in 1997 by prominent New York based
investment banker and financier Ziad K. Abdelnour, along with 56 other
Lebanese American activists, to educate the American public as to Lebanon's
strategic and moral significance as an ally of the United States and an
outpost of Western values in the Middle East.
http://www.freelebanon.org /

Middle Eastern Intelligence Bulletin links to the Free Lebanon page.
(PNAC members Daniel Pipes, Michael Rubin are listed)
Gary C. Gambill is the editor - here's a brief on him:
A specialist in Lebanese and Syrian politics, state sponsorship of terrorist
organizations, and authoritarianism in the Arab world, he is interviewed
frequently by the audio-visual and print media. Gambill can be reached by
phone at (646-242-1101) or by email at gambill@meib.org . (go ahead, give
him a call!)

More on Daniel Pipes - his website: http://www.danielpipes.org /
The wall street journal calls him an authoritative commentator on the Middle
Was nominated by * to the United States Institute of Peace in 2003.
(ugh)....[ Whenever an institute in USA has a "peace" or Inter-religious, or
religious, or "friendship; or USAID, US-AID etc. component in it, you can
be 100% sure that the real aims behind it all is Intelligence gathering or for
covert operations or BOTH....}
Here's a horrifying quote from Pipes (not sure if the source is reliable):
Pipes said the following about Bush's invasion of Iraq: "WMD was never the
basic reason for war. Nor was it the horrid repression in Iraq. Or the
danger Saddam posed to his neighbors. . The campaign in Iraq is about
keeping promises to the United States or paying the consequences. . Keep
your promises or you are gone. It's a powerful precedent that U.S. leaders
should make the most of." http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?m=20050130

Obvious to the gullible neocons who are not "in the know..." to consider
Syria a "quickie"; an almost effortless invasion by simply moving troops
across the border. Of course they need an excuse -
the Lebanese PNAC assassinations are perfect..... since they are carried out
on behalf of CIA2/MOSSAD by the infamous Assef Shawqat of Syria., the
local executor of the White House Murder Inc,
Listen to the outcry from Bushco.....

or just Israel's friends?

Curiouser, and curiouser.

Here's some more:

"I received an interesting email this afternoon from an American Jewish
woman. She claims that David Bukay of the Political Science department at
Haifa University in Israel is using his post to advocate "racist
expressions" directed against Arabs and Muslims. According to a student in
the Philosophy Department at the university, Bukay supports "the killing
Arabs only for being Arabs, claiming that they are criminals by their nature
and recommending to humiliate Palestinians in front of cameras, spreading
those pictures-and all this in a seminar, which is being classified by the
University as a duty in their studies toward fulfillment of bachelor's
degree in the Department of Political Science."

Bukay is not only a university professor, but also an author, editor, public
speaker, and "his fields of specialization are," according to the Ariel
Center for Policy Research (ACPR), "the Arab-Israeli conflict; inter-Arab
relations and the Palestinian question; international terrorism and
fundamental Islam; theoretical issues and political applications in the
Middle-East; Asad's foreign policy towards Israel and Lebanon; the culture
approach to understanding the Middle-East." It should be noted that the ACPR
counts as "Israel's Friends" several Congress critters, including Jim Saxon,
Bill McCollum, and Tom DeLay. "Contributing Experts" include the Strausscons
Frank J. Gaffney and Meyrav Wurmser, wife of David Wurmser, who is Principal
Deputy Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs in the
Office of Vice President Dick Cheney.

Burkay, who teaches his students that Arabs must be "shot in their heads by
a gun," according to student mentioned above, hosted a round table
discussion at the latest Jerusalem Summit, where Rep. Bob Beauprez (R-CO)
and the Islamophobe Daniel Pipes also gave speeches. "Over 150 leading
thinkers and statesmen from the US, Europe, Asia and Israel have convened at
the 3-day Jerusalem Summit, (Nov 27-30th, 2004), at Jerusalem's King David
Hotel," notes the Michael Cherney Foundation, a "humanitarian" organization
founded after "the night of the heinous terrorist bombing outside the
Dolphinarium Disco in Tel Aviv," on June 1, 2001 (no mention here of the
"heinous" terrorist bombings of Gaza by the IDF, killing far more than died
outside of the Dolphinarium Disco).

"One last note: Daniel Pipes, "the nation's leading Islamaphobe" (according
to the Council on American-Islamic Relations), who attended the Jerusalem
Summit and likely rubbed elbows with David Bukay, had made a career out of
trashing the livelihood of professors in America he considers not loyal
enough to Israel. For his effort, Bush announced in early 2003 Pipe's
nomination to the U.S. Institute of Peace, an irony, to say the least. ..."

Faking and rewriting history with concocted LIES is what they always did best...

**No longer in power, free to lie, Neocons seek to rewrite history.

BANISHED TO THINK TANKS: From top, neocons Elliot Abrams, Douglas Feith and Richard Perle.

Washington — The audience was a receptive one at the Brookings Institution during a recent presentation on foreign policy recommendations for the incoming president. Experts explained in detail their view of the Bush administration’s blunders and how the Obama team should reverse almost every policy the outgoing administration has set in place over the past eight years.

Still, as the litany of criticism continued, one person in the back row of the Brookings briefing room seemed to draw attention. It was Elliott Abrams, President Bush’s deputy national security adviser and probably the last neoconservative still serving in a senior position in the current administration.

By the end of January 2009, the tables will turn. Many of the outside experts, with their bold new ideas, will become part of the government, and current officials such as Abrams will look for their place in the capital’s think-tank scene.

The neoconservatives made up only a tiny fraction of the Bush policy team, but in the public eye they are seen as more responsible than others for setting the team’s course on foreign policy and national security.

Most of those who share Abrams’s views are already out of government. They left feeling bitter toward, and frustrated with, the outgoing administration for, as they saw it, making them scapegoats for the Iraq War. They had the same feelings for the liberals and the media who chose to side with their critics.

Now, neocons feel it is time to set the record straight and move on.

“We will go to the public. We will show a massive amount of documentation and explanation of what really went on,” declared David Wurmser, former Middle East adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney. “This will start the process of rewriting history, which up to now was written based on leaks against us. From our point our view, the past four years were miserable because we had to muzzle ourselves and remain loyal.”

The process, in fact, has already begun. In the beginning of 2008, Douglas Feith, who served in the Pentagon as under secretary of defense for policy, served up the opening volley with the publication of his memoir, “War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism.” If nothing else, the book makes good on Wurmser’s promise of copious documentation.

Feith, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis “Scooter” Libby, then Cheney’s chief of staff and national security adviser, were seen as the hard core of neoconservatism in the

Bush administration. Feith’s book, published in April 2008, tried to debunk the myth of neoconservative influence on the decision-making process leading up to the Iraq War. This is one of the main points that neocons are now trying to make.

“When the records get opened, no one will subscribe to these views anymore. Almost everything that is believed about us is wrong,” Feith said in an interview with the Forward. Richard Perle, who served on the Pentagon’s advisory board, added: “They called me the architect of the Iraq War. This is complete rubbish.” Perle is publishing an article in January that he hopes “will help set the record straight.”

While the neocons are in exile from power, articles and books remain the main arena for the neoconservative battle of ideas.

“Maybe the moral of our experience with the Bush administration is that we should stay in magazines and think tanks and not in government,” said Joshua Muravchik, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Muravchik sees himself as a neoconservative and has written extensively about the ideology.

Muravchik has also written articles defending the neoconservative viewpoint (“This is how I fight,” he said. “I won’t throw bombs”). He believes that life will be easier now that neocons are out of government. “We’re going back to a happier place,” he said. “We were always more comfortable being critics than endorsers.”

Thus, the neocon action now moves from the corridors of power back to the pages of Commentary magazine and The Weekly Standard, and to The Wall Street Journal’s opinion page. A refuge for those neocons leaving the Bush administration is now also found in the halls of supportive think tanks, mainly AEI, home base for Wolfowitz and Perle, and Hudson Institute, where Feith serves as a scholar.

Libby, however, resigned his Hudson position in 2007, after being convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice. Bush later commuted his jail sentence, meted out because of Libby’s false testimony to a grand jury investigating the public disclosure of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame’s identity after Plame’s husband publicly contradicted administration justifications for the Iraq War.

“This is a good place to take some time and reflect,” said Wurmser’s wife, Meyrav Wurmser, a Middle East scholar at Hudson. “People came out of this administration battered, and now they want to sit and think what went wrong,”

In mid-December 2008, Hudson threw its annual holiday party. It was themed as a dance club, and guests were treated to disco lights and to lighted margarita glasses. Participants reported that very few people actually took to the dance floor. Neoconservatives may feel relieved, but they are far from being in a partying mood.

By and large, many have decided that the path to rehabilitation and return to power can be completed by denouncing the outgoing presidential administration. The main target for neocons is Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, whose ideology of “realism” was a counterweight to neoconservatism in the administration. “My greatest frustration is with Condi Rice,” David Wurmser said. “I thought she would get it, that ultimately her approach would melt down. But it didn’t.”

Feith added: “The State Department and CIA people who opposed our views did so by leaking to the press stories that were not consistent with what went on inside the situation room. One of their themes was that there is a group of militaristic neocons pushing for war.”

The next step back to public life seems obvious to most neoconservatives: Once the record is fixed, it will be clear that the failure was due not to a faulty ideology, but to the fact that the administration failed to fully adopt and implement this ideology.

“The feeling of ‘America under attack’ that shaped the neoconservative view did not go away,” Meyrav Wurmser said. This view is also reflected in articles written by leading neoconservatives, who argue that the basics of neoconservatism are still valid: the need to protect America from Islamic extremism — seen as an imminent threat of the first order; the need to use pre-emptive force, if necessary, as a tool of achieving foreign policy goals, and the belief in putting promotion of democracy in the Arab and Muslim world at the top of America’s foreign policy agenda, above traditional American realpolitik interests.

Only one leading conservative thinker broke ranks with the group. Kenneth Adelman, who is considered a neocon by many but refers to himself as a “con-con,” publicly announced during the recent presidential campaign that he was voting for Barack Obama. He cited the Bush administration’s failures and his fear that McCain would bring more of the same. Adelman, who was an administration official for President Reagan, argued that McCain’s decisions were “plain weird.” Adelman also said he feared that another failed conservative president would be worse than a Democrat.

But for most neoconservatives, being critical of Bush’s conduct does not mean switching sides or giving up their ideology.

Moreover, they hope that the Iraq War, which was a focal point for anti-neocon criticism, is ripe for being revisited. The decline in violence and relative stability has given neocons a sense of vindication. “The fact the war — even though it was very costly — may actually end with quite good results might change the attitude toward those who were involved in the analysis process,” Feith said. “The premise of a lot of the criticism will be exposed to be wrong.”

Still, some of the criticism is based on facts already documented and open to the public. Such is the case with the close contacts that neoconservatives had with Iraqi opposition figure Ahmed Chalabi, who later turned his back on the Americans and was accused of cooperating with Iran against American forces in Iraq.

Neoconservatives also came under fire for scorning as unrealistic an assessment of Eric Shinseki, then an army chief of staff general, that the war would require “several hundred thousand soldiers,” and for scorning White House economic adviser Lawrence Lindsey’s estimate that the war would cost Americans some $100 billion to $200 billion. Wolfowitz predicted that the war would be financed by Iraq oil revenues and cost the United States virtually nothing.

The surge later brought the number of American troop members in Iraq close to Shinseki’s prediction. The retired general was recently chosen to be President-elect Obama’s veteran affairs secretary. Juan Cole, a history professor at the University of Michigan, told The Washington Post, “If Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith had listened to Shinseki, there wouldn’t be as many wounded veterans to take care of.”

According to a 2006 Congressional Research Service study, by that point the war had cost $261 billion. The study estimated that the ultimate total would reach higher than $549 billion.

The lengthy process for the rehabilitation of Iraq can fit well with the political timeline, perhaps in time for the next presidential campaign. But for some neocons, the idea of re-entering the political system does not have much appeal. (“I’m not a Republican,” Perle said.) Others are trying to look ahead and reframe the political future of neoconservative ideology.

This future, according to David Wurmser, is as far out of Washington as possible. “I can see neocons reaching out to governors and seeing them as the future hard-line leaders,” he said. Some names already thrown out include Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, a 2008 vice presidential candidate. “She is very smart,” Wurmser said, though he admits she needs “to acquire more foreign policy understanding.”

The neoconservatives seeking rehabilitation are facing a tough battle. The broader foreign policy community, made up of both Republican-leaning realists and liberal critics of the hard-line approach, has largely rejected the neoconservative narrative. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former White House national security adviser and a guru of foreign policy realism, warned that “if neocon policies continue to be pursued, the United States will be expelled from the region.”


Thursday, December 25, 2008

The Israeli Who Will Run the Obama White House. Why is this man laughing? Rahm Emanuel, Obama's political handler and new chief of staff.

The Israeli Who Will Run the Obama White House

Why is this man laughing? Rahm Emanuel, Obama's political handler and new chief of staff, is an Israeli whose father is a member of the most notorious terrorist group in Israeli history. How long will the controlled media ignore Emanuel's family ties to Zionist terrorism? Do Americans, the people forced to fight and fund the fraudulent, violent, and costly "War on Terror" even care?

If you appreciate the information found in my articles, please send a donation. My latest article is about Joseph Adam Ereli, the Israeli national and son of a Hagana terrorist in the U.S. State Department. Ereli is Israel's point man in Iraq, where he oversees the application of U.S. policy in the region.

Joseph Adam Ereli (right) is an Israeli and the son of a Hagana terrorist.
Ereli oversees U.S. policy in Iraq and the Persian Gulf. Why do Americans allow Israelis to hijack U.S. foreign policy? Why is Ereli's Israeli nationality not considered a threat to national security? Why does the controlled media ignore the many Israeli dual-nationals in positions of power in the U.S. government?

Ereli's father, Eliezer Kaplan (changed to Ereli) fought with the Zionist terrorist organization, the Hagana. This son of an Zionist terrorist has been controlling U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East for two decades. Like the other Israelis I have exposed: Rahm Emanuel, Michael Chertoff, and Daniel Samuel Senor, this U.S. official is an agent produced by the Israeli military intelligence network that was sent to the United States in the 1950s. These people are Zionist agents who were raised to control the U.S. government. This is very serious infiltration that cannot be ignored by real Americans. We can't allow foreign agents in high places to destroy our country.
I compare the current condition of the U.S. ship of state with the huge oil tanker Sirius Star, which has been taken over by Somali pirates and is being held for ransom in Somalia.

The Sirius Star, with $100 million of Saudi crude,
was hijacked by a small band of Somali pirates.

The United States government is like the Sirius Star -- except our ship of state has been taken over by a gang of organized Zionist and Israeli pirates. The difference is that our American ship of state has been taken over by an organization (like Quantum in the latest Bond film) that most people don't even know exists. This organization was created by members of the pre-Israel Zionist terror groups, the Hagana, Irgun, Lehi, and their Mossad network. Members of these groups were sent to the United States in the 1950s to raise dedicated Zionist agents that would look and sound like Americans but think like Israelis. In this way Zionists have taken over the government and media of the U.S.S. America without the passengers or the crew even noticing. The only thing that most Americans notice is that the voyage is not as smooth as they had expected and the ship is sinking. The Zionist-controlled media assures us, however, that all is well and the ship is on its correct course. Dream on.

Americans and others need to realize that Israeli intelligence is like the criminal organization in the latest James Bond film: They are everywhere, supporting politicians on both sides of the aisle, creating and running governments from the left and the right (including your own), yet you don't even know they exist! Over the past 6 decades, Israeli agents have infiltrated every agency of the U.S. government and have access to all of the critical computer networks. My next article is in the same vein as my revelations about the senior Israeli agents Michael Chertoff, Rahm Emanuel, and Dan Senor.
My research is supported by my readers and I need financial support to produce these articles. I will send them to the people who donate to my research and publish them when I have raised the funds to pay for their production. Thank you for your support.

Donations are needed and can be sent by PayPal to:

shop@bollynbooks.com This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it or bollyn@bollynbooks.com This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

If PayPal does not work for you, you can send
a personal check or money order to:

Christopher Bollyn
3 Golf Center, Suite 365
Hoffman Est., IL 60169 (USA).
Commenting on my article about Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama, an American supporter sent this note, with his donation:

Keep researching and writing. Eventually, even the sheeple will have to take notice. Your article on Emanuel is a treasure. I was stupefied after reading as I watched a ten-minute segment on him on The McLaughlin Group - you'd think they were talking about a Kansas farm boy. No background info.
"No background info" is exactly how the controlled media covers Rahm Emanuel, Bernard Madoff, and every other Zionist criminal. This is the fundamental difference between my articles and those of the controlled media -- I provide the background material that matters. This is also why I was attacked by undercover police at my home in 2006, maliciously prosecuted, and forced to go into exile.

Emanuel, an Israeli citizen (from my hometown) who employs Chicago gangster tactics, will be the next chief of staff of the executive branch of the U.S. government. You simply will not get the information in my article from any other journalist. CNN and the other controlled media will not even broach the subject of Emanuel's Israeli roots. In order to understand what the Obama administration will mean for America and the world, however, it is essential to understand the immense Zionist power and money behind Obama.

Can Obama deliver change with so many Zionist strings attached?
When one considers that Obama has been financed and supported by the biggest Zionists in America since 1992 it becomes clear that John McCain was merely playing the role of a presidential candidate, i.e. he was a fake candidate whose real purpose was to allow his opponent to win. This can only be understood when one realizes that both political parties in the United States are completely controlled by Zionist money.

John McCain, who would have been the oldest president ever, was not meant to win. His only purpose was to make the rigged presidential race look like a real political contest, which is one of the fundamental deceptions of U.S. politics. The other is that our votes are actually counted.

More than 24,000 people have read my article about Obama's chief of staff, the Israeli son-of-a-terrorist Rahm Emanuel, yet only 22 people have responded to my appeal for donations: twelve Americans, four Australians, two Canadians, one Japanese, a Swede, a Brit, and a Scot. I realize that times are tough all over with the Zionist-manufactured "credit crunch" (if you are not a Zionist billionaire like Sanford Weill of Citigroup or Maurice Greenberg of AIG on the receiving end of the $2 Trillion bail-out) but I need more support than this to cover my costs.

Hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars from the $2 Trillion bail-out have gone to criminal organizations run by these two Elders of Zion: Sanford Weill, head of Citigroup, and Maurice Greenberg, head of A.I.G. Both are sons of Jewish immigrants from Russia/Poland and certainly high-level Freemasons in the B'nai B'rith, the real-life Elders of Zion. Why are their dodgy and criminal enterprises bailed out with hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars while Amtrak, the woefully inadequate American passenger railroad system, is not given a penny to build new infrastructure, rolling stock, or stations to serve the American people? These fraudsters should be in prison -- not bailed out at taxpayer expense!

Rahm Emanuel: The Israeli

Who Will Run Obama's White House

Rahm Emanuel is a political gangster named after a Zionist fighter who belonged to the Stern Gang, which was a terrorist organization linked with the Nazis. Before moving to Chicago, his father was an active member of this terrorist group of assassins and bombers, which was also known as LEHI. Don't expect to hear this information on CNN. The controlled media censors these disturbing, but important facts.

"Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff" is the headline of a November 6 article in Ha'aretz, the Israeli newspaper. The Israeli editors at Ha'aretz proudly proclaim that Obama's first pick was "Israeli Rahm Emanuel" to run the next administration. Americans should be aware that Obama's chief of staff will be an Israeli, with terrorist roots and a clear loyalty to the state of Israel.

Emanuel's father, Benjamin, told Ma'ariv, a Hebrew language Israeli paper that his son's appointment would be good for Israel. "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel," the Jerusalem Post reported. "Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House." Rahm speaks Hebrew and spends most summers in Tel Aviv his Israeli father proudly told Ma'ariv.

Although the Israeli Emanuel has been named as Obama's chief of staff, none of the Zionist-controlled media outlets in the United States seem as open as the Israeli press to discuss Emanuel's family roots with the Nazi-linked Zionist terror gangs in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s. Naftali Bendavid of the Zionist-owned Chicago Tribune, for example, has written a book about Emanuel and spent a great deal of time with him but completely avoids his Israeli roots in the Tribune article he wrote on November 6.

Bendavid wrote that Emanuel "is best known as something of a Democratic political assassin" who "might not appear to be the obvious choice for White House chief of staff for a president-elect who speaks eloquently of setting aside partisan differences and bringing the country together."

Emanuel uses Mafia tactics to threaten people. He once mailed a rotting dead fish to a campaign pollster who had not produced results to Emanuel's liking. Sending a dead fish to a person is a well-known Mafia message meaning the recipient will "sleep with the fishes" unless he or she heeds the warning.

Don't expect the controlled media to tell you the whole truth about Emanuel's family ties to real assassins. To get an idea of who Emanuel really is, I recommend my 2006 article, "Son of a Zionist Terrorist -- Rahm Emanuel's Dirty Secret."

Emanuel even left the United States to serve in the Israeli army in 1991. A person from any other nation would automatically lose his U.S. citizenship for serving in a foreign military. Why do we let Israelis run our government?

What will it take to remove people like Emanuel and Michael Chertoff from their positions of power to prevent them from damaging our American republic more than they already have? The Zionist agents in our government are in the process of accumulating power and not afraid of showing it or using it. This is a very dangerous development. Americans should be aware that Emanuel behaves more like a gangster than a political adviser.

"The night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting "Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!" and plunging the knife into the table after every name. "When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape," one campaign veteran recalls. "It was like something out of The Godfather. But that's Rahm for you."
- "The Enforcer," Rolling Stone, Oct. 20, 2005

Americans should be aware that this violent and uncouth Israeli will be running the White House under Barack Obama. The chief of staff effectively controls the people around the president -- he decides who sees him, what he hears, and what he knows. The people surrounding the president report to the chief of staff. Emanuel will be the intellectual handler of President Obama (a continuation of the role he has played for years) and the controller of the White House. How do you think having an Israeli gangster with terrorist roots running the White House will affect U.S. relations with Iran, Russia, the Palestinians -- and the rest of the world? And Emanuel is just the tip of the iceberg.


Emanuel's father said Rahm is "the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi
combatant." LEHI, a.k.a. the Stern Gang, was the most radical Zionist terrorist group in the 1940s. The Stern Gang killed scores of British soldiers and assassinated Lord Moyne and Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nations envoy from Sweden, as well as hundreds of innocent Palestinians such as the civilian population of Deir Yassin. This Zionist terror group was allied with the Nazis in their war against the British. Both of Emanuel's parents, Benjamin Emanuel (formerly Auerbach) and Marsha Smulevitz, lived in Israel and both are related to Lehi fighters. This is to say that Emanuel's father, a Jew, fought with the Nazis. While this may be difficult for people who have a distorted Hollywood-view of Zionist history to understand, it is a fact.

The Brothers Emanuel: Ezekiel,
Rahm or Rahamim, and Ariel with their father Benjamin Auerbach (changed to Emanuel in memory of his brother who was allegedly killed in an Irgun "reprisal" operation in 1933). Ben was an active member of the Stern Gang, a Zionist terror group allied with the Nazis which is known for a series of political assassinations, massacres, and bombings. Why would a dedicated Zionist, who was born in Jerusalem and who fought in a terrorist organization to create the Jewish state, move to Chicago after the creation of the state of Israel? After the failed "Lavon Affair," a series of false-flag terror attacks in Egypt, Israeli intelligence chief Yossi Harel sent scores of high-level agents to the United States, often with an American spouse. The Emanuel family is one of them; the Chertoff family is another. There are many more.

Rahm Emanuel is the same Israeli who ran the White House under Bill Clinton, although he did not have the chief of staff position. He is the person who pushed through the disastrous NAFTA legislation. It should be remembered that it was during the Clinton administration, while the president dallied with his chunky Jewish girlfriend, that the foundation of the Zionist terror network that pulled off 9-11 was laid. Now, Emanuel, the son of a terrorist and assassin, will be back in the Oval Office.

Emanuel has controlled Obama for years. Emanuel's brother Ariel is Michael Moore's agent. The day after the election, Moore joked about Emanuel's appointment on the Larry King Show. Moore, a Zionist shill, made a film about 9-11, produced by the Weinstein brothers, that completely avoided mentioning the many Israeli connections to the terror attacks. This is an excellent example of how the "alternative" media is just as controlled by Zionist Jews as the so-called "mainstream" media.

Emanuel, the son of an Israeli terrorist (Irgun and Lehi) is part of the Chicago-based Zionist political team with David Axelrod, Obama's chief campaign strategist. Obama thanked David Axelrod by name during his victory speech in Chicago's Grant Park. The very next day, Obama named Axelrod "senior White House adviser," the Oval Office position Emanuel occupied under Clinton. Axelrod's father, Joseph, a Jewish immigrant from someplace near the Black Sea, hanged himself in 1974 when David was a 19-year-old student at the University of Chicago. His mother was a communist journalist in New York in the 1940s who later became a vice president of Young & Rubicam, the advertising company.

David Axelrod ran the Obama campaign.

Rahm Emanuel, who is named after a Lehi (Stern Gang) terrorist named Rahamim Cohen, and David Axelrod have been working together since 1984 when they teamed up to help Paul Simon (Mr. Bowtie) defeat Sen. Charles Percy (R-Ill.).

These two hard-core Zionists were not working for reform in Illinois; their only agenda was to defeat the incumbent Sen. Percy because he was the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and was pushing for a settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. These Zionist gangsters went on to support the Chicago mayoral campaign of Richard M. Daley, the son of Richard J. Daley. These two Zionists spearheaded the campaign to put Barack Obama into the White House. Axelrod and Emanuel, however, were being supported by a much higher Zionist -- Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter of Chicago's super-Zionist Philip Klutznick.

Axelrod has been creating and shaping Candidate Obama for more than 16 years. "Axelrod met Obama when the senator was 30 years old and coordinating a voter-registration drive in Chicago and Betty Lou Saltzman, a doyenne of progressive politics in Chicago, suggested that the two get to know each other," the New York Times reported in early 2007. "In the 15 years since, Axelrod has worked through Obama's life story again and again, scouring it for usable political material.

Bettylu Saltzman has been supporting and financing Obama's political career since 1992, long before he ran for any office. Saltzman is the only daughter of the super-Zionist Philip Klutznick. In 1992, when Obama was 30 years old, Saltzman told Axelrod and others, "He will be our first black president.'' Saltzman then commissioned Axelrod to create Obama, the presidential candidate.

Saltzman's father, Philip M. Klutznick, was Israel's biggest supporter in Chicago. Klutznick, who passed away in August 1999, was the former president of B'nai B'rith International (1953-59), president of the World Jewish Congress, general chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), president of the American Friends of the Hebrew University, vice-president of the Jewish Welfare Board, a founder of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, president of the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture, and vice president of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, among other things.

Philip Morris Klutznick, ca. 1944
"The friend of 6 U.S. Presidents," Klutznick fostered
the Obama campaign through his daughter Bettylu from 1992 until his death in 1999.

Klutznick was one of the developers of Israel's port of Ashdod. As a developer in Chicago, Klutznick created the suburb of Park Forest, developed three Chicago-area shopping malls, and built Water Tower Place on Michigan Ave., in downtown Chicago.

Candidate Obama with his long-term handler David Axelrod, who writes his speeches and instructs him on how to act. Obama has been created and controlled to such a degree by Jews that some writers have described him as the "Goy Golem," a slave created by his Jewish masters to destroy their enemies. According to the Jewish Kabbalah, a Golem is a man-like monster created from mud and conjured up by a rabbi to destroy any and all enemies of the Jews..

Axelrod and Emanuel have been creating the Obama image since 2003. "For four years Axelrod has had camera crews tracking virtually everything Obama has done in public -- chatting up World War II vets in southern Illinois, visiting his father’s ancestral village in western Kenya -- and there were days when the camera crews have outnumbered the civilians," Ben Wallace-Wells reported in the New York Times article of April 1, 2007.


In October I warned readers that the Obama ticket was really a hard-core Israeli ticket in disguise. In my article "Colin Powell: Liar & War Criminal Endorses Obama" I advised my readers of the Israeli gangsters behind Obama:

Powell's endorsement of Obama, a puppet of the Israeli Rahm Emanuel, has less to do with Obama's African roots than it does with getting Emanuel and his Zionist gangsters back into control of the Oval Office. Emanuel, the real boss of the Democratic party is the son of a real Israeli terrorist (Irgun and Lehi) and thug-in-chief of the party.

What can we expect from the Obama presidency? Elected on a platform of "Change" after 8 years of an unpopular and dictatorial regime, we would expect to see changes of the disastrous policies of the Bush administration.

What changes will we see? Will we see an end to the costly and illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ? Will the senior officials of the Bush administration who willfully lied to start these wars of aggression be held accountable for their war crimes? Will we finally have a proper and independent investigation of 9-11? Will the ghoulish Israeli Michael Chertoff be fired and his oppressive Department of Homeland Security dismantled?

If the war criminals are not held accountable and the most egregious criminal policies of the Bush administration are not changed and reversed – what exactly does the Obama "Change" slogan mean? Changing the curtains? Changing the Israelis in the White House?

The appointment of Rahm Emanuel, Clinton 's senior advisor, to run the Obama White House does not look like a positive change. I was hoping for someone like Michael Jordan to be the next secretary of state. Rather than Israelis like Emanuel, we need people like Jordan in power to turn our national game around.

Michael Jordan would be an ideal U.S. Secretary of State.

Jordan is impressive, has a strong strategic mind, and knows how to win against incredible odds. We've seen him do it many times. He is articulate, greatly admired around the globe -- and he can fly. Under Barack Obama and old foreign policy hand Sen. Joe Biden, who could possibly be a better representative for the new administration than Michael Jordan? (Of course, Jordan would probably refuse to work with a nasty fellow like Emanuel, but he could stuff the Israeli.)

Michael Jordan with the Chicago Bulls

The announcement that Obama has chosen an Israeli to run the White House staff has dashed any hopes we might have of a American "Dream Team," with Michael Jordan or not, in the next administration. Rather than having a team of strong, smart, and patriotic Americans who can restore the American dream and soar, we will probably wind up with a bunch of nasty Zionist Jews who can't even jump and couldn't care less about America. Emanuel's staff will probably be more of an Israeli dream team of radical Zionists -- but what consequences will that have for America -- and the Middle East?
Here is the complete text of the Ha'aretz article:

Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff

By Anshel Pfeffer and Shlomo Shamir
Haaretz Correspondents and AP
A day after his historic election to become the first black American president, Barack Obama stepped into the role of president-elect yesterday, inviting Rahm Emanuel to join his administration as White House chief of staff, Democratic officials said.

Emanuel, a former Bill Clinton adviser, is the son of a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of the Irgun (Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in Palestine between 1931 and 1948.

Obama intends to announce key cabinet and staff staff members in the next few days to ensure a swift transition to the White House in January, which would allow him to deal with the global economic crisis as quickly as possible.

If Emanuel accepts, he will return to the White House, where he served as a political and policy adviser to Clinton . Emanuel is the fourth-ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives as the Democratic Caucus chairman.

Emanuel knows Obama from his hometown Chicago and headed the special team that planned the midterm elections in 2006, in which the Democrats recaptured a Congressional majority.

Emanuel also served as inspiration for the fictional character Joshua "Josh" Lyman, the deputy White House chief of staff, played by Bradley Whitford on the television drama "The West Wing."

Obama is expected to appoint loyal advisers and aides to central cabinet and staff positions, as well as experienced officials from the Clinton administration and a few prominent Republicans to enhance his intention to bridge political gaps.

Several Democrats said Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, the party's 2004 presidential nominee, was actively seeking appointment as secretary of state in the new administration.

They said Obama would issue a written statement announcing that his transition team would be headed by John Podesta, who served as chief of staff under Clinton; Pete Rouse, who has been Obama's chief of staff in the Senate; and Valerie Jarrett, a friend of the president-elect and campaign adviser.

One of the most talked-about appointments is the Treasury Department secretary. The names most mentioned for this post are former Clinton administration Treasury bosses Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin. Or Obama might keep Secretary Henry Paulson.

Other candidates include a former Summers deputy, Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York , and billionaires Warren Buffett and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

The president-elect had breakfast yesterday with his wife and daughters, then left his house for a workout at a nearby gym. Aides said he intended to visit his campaign headquarters later in the day to thank his staff.

Obama has 10 weeks to build a new administration. But his status as an incumbent member of Congress presents issues unseen since 1960, when Democrat John F. Kennedy moved from the Senate to the White House.

Rahm Emanuel's father, Benjamin, yesterday refused to comment on the report that his son was appointed White House chief of staff. He told Haaretz that he would only comment after speaking to his son.

"Obama is a pro-Israeli leader and will be a friend to Israel ," he said, adding that he was pleased with Obama's election. He also said his son is the namesake of Rahamim, a Lehi combatant who was killed.

Emanuel is very color conscious; the tie is Israeli blue...

...which Obama and Biden also seem to prefer...

...just like George W. Bush.


Sources and Recommended Reading

Barack Obama: The Goy Golem of the Jews, Tworca.org

Bollyn, Christopher, "ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus," December 31, 2007

Bollyn, Christopher, "Son of a Zionist Terrorist: Rahm Emanuel’s Dirty Secret," November 17, 2006
Original article here.

Bollyn, Christopher, "Colin Powell: Liar & War Criminal Endorses Obama,"
October 16, 2008

Bendavid, Naftali, "Rahm Emanuel mulls chief of staff role in Barack Obama's administration," Chicago Tribune, November 6, 2008

Bumiller, Elisabeth, "The Brothers Emanuel," New York Times, June 15, 1997

Green, Joshua, "The Enforcer," Rolling Stone, October 20, 2005

"Emanuel to be Obama's chief of staff," Jerusalem Post, November 6, 2008

Klutznick, Philip M., Biography from Biographical Directory of the United States Executive Branch, 1774-1989 (1990), edited by Robert Sobel, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT

"Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff," Ha'aretz
November 6, 2008

Wallace-Wells, Ben, "Obama’s Narrator," New York Times, April 1, 2007